Non-approved Minutes

MONADNOCK REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

SCHOOL BOARD AGENDA

March 4, 2008

Monadnock Regional Middle/High School, Swanzey, NH

 

Present: Jonathan Kenyon, Gene White, Jane Fortson, Colline Dreyfuss, Karen Cota, Ed Jacod, Phyllis Peterson, Winston Wright, Doug Lyman, William Felton, Susan Oerman, James Carnie and Ken Colby. Absent: Tim Aho and Tim Peloquin.

Also Present: K. Dassau, Superintendent, D. Hodgdon, Assistant Superintendent, Katie Chambers, Business Manager and C. Boyle, Director of Technology. Principals: J. Smith, S. Rashid, B. Tatro and K. Carter.

 

1.                  �AGENDA: MOTION: K. Colby MOVED to accept the February 12, 2008 Board Meeting Minutes as presented.� SECOND: K. Cota. VOTE: 12.400/0/0/2.600. (J. Carnie missing from vote) Motion passes. �MOTION: K. Colby MOVED to accept the February 19, 2008 Board Meeting Minutes as presented. SECOND: J. Kenyon. VOTE: 11.379/0/2.142/1.479. Motion passes.

 

2.                  STUDENT GOVERNMENT REPORT: There was no student rep. present. J. Smith reported that the Student Government is working on the Peer Mediation. There would be a school wide meeting next Tuesday to discuss this issue.

 

C. Dreyfuss informed the Board that the Keene Sentinel and MC� are recording the meeting.

 

3.                  CORRESPONDENCE AND ANNOUNCEMENTS: K. Dassau reported that the annual report has been printed and distributed.

 

B. Tatro explained that there was an election at Mt. Caesar to name the husky. After the children voted they received a sticker that said “ I Voted”. Hopefully this would encourage their parents to vote on Tuesday.

 

K. Dassau reported that the front cover of the town of Swanzey’s annual report was done by D. Crowder the High School Art Teacher in the District.

 

K. Dassau reported that the Director of the NEASC is in attendance, Pamela Gray Bennett.

 

4.                  PUBLIC COMMENTS: N. Moriarty thanked the Director of the NEASC for being present. N. Moriarty commented on information that he got off the Internet. He said the per pupil cost of the high school has increased 47% since 1997. He also asked what happened to the 11th graders with the NECAP Testing. He said that the teacher’s salary and the drop out rate at Monadnock are the 2nd highest compared to area schools. He said that we have 15 months to help the 11th graders before they graduate.

 

S. Rashid thanked the Board for their kind words at the last meeting. He said leaving Cutler was a very hard decision. He has always felt that at the end of his career it would be at a high school. He said that it has been a positive experience in Monadnock. He said that there is still a lot of hard work that has to be completed. Everyone needs to work together and put their differences aside. Do the right thing for our children. Take care of the business for our children.

 

5.                  CURRICULUM REPORT: NEASC Update: Pamela Gray Bennett explained that she has been asked to speak about the NEASC Process and who the NEASC is. They are one of 6 regional accreditation associations. It is a membership organization. They identify standards of effective practice. People choose to join us. The process begins with a self-study then a visiting team of volunteers make an assessment and a report is written. They have approximately 655 members. All the member schools have strengths and needs. Our purpose is school improvement. Our expectation is that the school would resolve the issues in a matter of time. The amount of time would depend on the issue. She explained that she is the director and does not make any decisions. There are 26 people that are elected to do that job. Monadnock was placed on warning after the self-study and then placed on probation after the teams visit. She commented that there is no surprise, nothing unusual. The building is old. NEASC has identified the concerns but have never said build “new”. NEASC is saying that it is in the best interest of the children and community that these items get fixed. She said that they commend the District for the hiring of the architect and 1 million-dollars for health and safety and addressing the roof repair concerns. In her judgement the District is making good progress. Correcting the concerns the NEASC have identified should be done in the best interest of the students. She explained that the cost of the membership into the NEASC is between $2000.00 and $2800.00 a year. There are 8 paid staff members. K. Cota asked about the expectations and the huge difference between each state. P. Bennett explained that the standards reflect research supporting teaching and learning.  Accreditation is about adult, teacher and community performance. At any one time there are at least 25 schools that are on probation. The standards are not just about teaching and learning but about the facilities. When you join you agree to address the needs. P. Peterson commented that the funding in NH is a big problem. P. Bennett explained that the NEASC is not asking for the concerns to be addressed tomorrow but in a timely manner. D. Lyman asked if the economics of the area is taken into account. P. Bennett commented that it is based on the NEASC standards. They do look at the school and the community to meet the needs of the students. It was asked if there was any way to meet the standards with some short cuts. P. Bennett said that there are other communities that have the same situation. E.Jacod commented that it is his personal opinion that the quality and commitment of the parent to get a better education for the student. In southern NH we are expected to compete with other states that have more adequate funding. He said that there is lack of consideration for the community. We are not high rollers. We do not have the money to support the lavish ideas that you have. We have worked on some of these issues. We do not have the parent support for the children. K. Dassau commented that participation is a voluntary process. We are accepting the accreditation criteria. C. Dreyfuss commented that we are in the right direction. J.Kenyon commented that there are a number of districts that have built or brought buildings up to par and they have a tax base less than our district. We might do it. It was asked if being accredited buys us anything. P. Bennett commented that when people buy a house they ask about the schools. The accreditation is an assurance. If a school looses their accreditation that is alarming to parents. Then there are some colleges that are alarmed if a school is not accredited. Some grants and loans are connected to accreditation. There is a connection between accreditation and colleges. Fewer lab experiments due to the condition of the science labs could affect the competitive colleges. NEASC is about the student. We want the facility to support and enhance instruction. J. Carnie asked how many team members were from NH and Mass. P. Bennett did not have that information at hand but could get it. She explained that the team is made up of volunteers. The District pays for the hotels and the food for the team members. J. Carnie commented on the comment about the lack of maintenance. He said that 9 or 10 of the maintenance warrant articles have passed in previous years. The District has supported them. P. Bennett explained that the list of concerns might have been addressed. J. Carnie commented that the passing of the warrants goes back a lot further. He has concern about the misinformation. J.Carnie asked where the air quality information came from. He stated that OSHA has never been in the building. P. Bennett could not answer the question at this time. P. Bennett did say that any concerns that were identified the school had the opportunity to respond. P. Bennett told J. Carnie that she could speak to him after the discussion. J. Carnie commented that a great facility does not mean better education. The funding should be considered. C. Dreyfuss thanked P. Bennett for her explanation. C. Dreyfuss commented that the community has supported maintenance and we are going in the right direction. J. Fortson commented on the repeated default budget. She commented that this year again we might have additional funds coming back. We are giving our schools what they say they need. If not someone else is not stepping up to the plate.

 

AYP Report: D. Hodgdon commented on the amount of testing results and to emphasize that the teachers and the staff is working towards an effective education for the students. There are results from other tests besides the NECAP that are showing that the students are learning. There are so many factors on how our testing results. There is little to gloss over. The State Test results are also low. This is the first time administering the NECAP to the high school. The high school curriculum may not be lined up to the grade span expectations from the State. Another factor is that the students may not take the test seriously. K.Dassau, D. Hodgdon, B. Pickering and J. Smith met. J. Smith met with the dept. heads to examine the results. They need to determine why the students did poorly.  K. Dassau suggested that the board wait for J.Smith to return to answer some of the questions. The discussion on the NECAP has to be done soon. D. Hodgdon commented that is exactly what we are doing. We need to look at what the reasons are for the low test scores.

 

6.               NEW BUSINESS:

1.               Letter from the Assistant Attorney General: K. Dassau explained that the letter was in the Board’s packet and an informational item. J. Carnie corrected part of the letter and said that Richmond started counting the votes that night but it was not completed.

2.               Budget Transfer (Student Management System Software): C. Boyle explained that there was a savings at Mt. Caesar, Troy and Emerson for a technology position at a lower salary. There is a significant discount on the system. The Finance Committee recommended this transfer. MOTION: P. Peterson MOVED to accept the budget transfer in the amount of $27,612.75 from the tech support at Mt. Caesar, Emerson and Troy for the SMSS. SECOND: W. Wright DISCUSSION: E.Jacod commented that it was a substantial savings. C.Boyle explained that this is a one-time purchase with an $11,000.00 yearly fee. VOTE: 13.521/0/0/1.479. Motion passes.

3.               Budget Transfer (MC2 Action 1Form): MOTION: J. Fortson. MOVED to accept the budget transfer in the amount of $3250.00 from the Regular Ed. Purchased Services Account to the Regular Ed. Teacher’ Salaries Account SECOND: D.Lyman. DISCUSSION: K. Carter explained that the transfer was for two Wilderness Trek leaders. K. Chambers commented that this would realign the budget accounts. VOTE: 10.570/0/2.951/1.479. Motion passes.

4.  Request from the Health Insurance Study Committee: K.Dassau explained that the committee would like to make recommendations to the Boards and then the SAU Board. MOTION: D. Lyman MOVED to give the SAU Health Insurance Study Committee the authority to make recommendations to the Monadnock School board to recommend a health plan that meets the needs. SECOND: P.Peterson. VOTE: 13.521/0/0/1.479. Motion passes.   

 

           Continued discussion on AYP: J.Smith explained that he has had 2 and ½ days to look at the results of the testing. The English teachers were really surprised by how horribly the students did. The teachers in Algebra College 2 looked at the test results. Eleven out of the fifteen students in that class that scored below proficient scored 20% or better on their PSATs. The students do have the math skills but performed really bad. Some students do not care because there is no impact to them. Administrators plan on meeting with students to see if they can find out what happened. J. Fortson said that she is angry and wants to know what happened. J. Smith said that he would like to know.. E Jacod asked if the District retains students. D. Hodgdon explained that we do have a policy. K. Dassau commented that we have had this conversation and suggested the board should review the policy.  D.Lyman asked if we are aligned to the state curriculum. D. Hodgdon commented that there are options that we need to look at. D.Lyman asked D.Hodgdon why he did not know if we are aligned. D.Hodgdon commented that he is not sure how closely everything is aligned. He is not sure throughout the schools. D.Lyman commented that it has been two years from day one. D.Hodgdon commented that the elementary schools have been working on the process. D. Lyman asked why we did not align the curriculum when we knew the test was coming. D. Hodgdon commented that we are aligning for the elementary schools and should see the results. This is the first year for the high school. We are looking at grade span expectations. We were not aligned at day one. The process started with the early test results. We have been working. K. Cota commented that there should be the opportunity for all kids to know the importance of the testing. Perhaps the Student Government could get the word out to let them know what is at stake. She commented that she has been a little disappointed in the Student Government since its inception. S. Oerman asked if the students loose anything when we are required to teach to the test. D. Hodgdon explained that the grade span expectations do not limit what is taught. The standards of the test are okay. At the elementary school level so much time is invested that something may be lost. It was commented that the students need to know the impact this has on the whole school. K.Dassau commented that none of these issues are easy. We need to see if some of the issues are the problems in the test. J.Kenyon asked if anyone double-checked the date. K. Dassau explained that 74% of the State did not make proficient. D. Hodgdon explained that no one double-checked the figures because we do not have that information. We can check the data that we have. K.Dassau commented that it was suggested at another meeting that successful test scores should be attached to student parking spaces. J. Smith would be giving an update on the AYP next steps and data.   

 

 

 

 

7.               OLD BUSINESS: :

1.               Letter from Paul Apple to the Assistant Attorney General: K. Dassau explained that the letter is for informational purposes. J. Carnie asked if there would be a non-public session. K. Dassau explained that there would not be a non-public. J.Carnie asked to add a non-public under RSA 91 A: litigation for the next agenda. MOTION: J.Carnie. MOVED to add a non-public session under RSA 91:litigation on the next meeting agenda. SECOND: E. Jacod. DISCUSSION: G. White asked what the issue was about. J. Carnie explained to discuss the letter from Attorney Apple and to see if it was appropriate. VOTE: 5.244/6.077/2.200/1.479. Motion fails.  

2.               Surry Transition: The committee members are J. Fortson, J. Carnie and W.Wright. the next meeting is March 6,2008. The committee would be discussing the request from the Surry board to tuition the 9th, 10th and 11th grade students. The committee would be looking at the weighted vote. J.Carnie commented that the Board as a whole should take a vote on the cost of the Surry School. R. Todd has a figure and we need to decide what that number is. They Surry board is going with the acceptance of R. Todd’s figure. C. Dreyfuss asked the committee members for information on the figure. K. Dassau explained that the Surry take over date is July 1, 2008. The Policy for the weighted vote is JFAB. He said that the State has to approve the weighted vote he would assume. 

3.               Potential Unfunded Litigation: K. Chambers explained that there was discussion in the Finance Committee but no movement. D. Lyman reported that there was no new information. The local government center will be hosting the informational dinners to give updates. He commented that Bill 1645 with the amendment is the way to go. To protect the employees and the retirees. C. Dreyfuss suggested that the Legislative Rep. D. Lyman and the K. Chambers meet to make a recommendation to the Board. W. Felton reminded the Board of the 48 hour notification. The amount of money in question is roughly $3000.00.

 

8.  SCHOOL BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS: 

1.               Community Relations Committee: K.Colby reported that the committee has not met and he would commend all the members for staying within the budget. C. Dreyfuss explained that she, K. Dassau and K. Chambers were on the Cynthia Georgina Show, a radio show promoting the scool board and budget committee recommendations..

2.               Facilities Committee: K. Cota reported that the maintenance staff has prepared for the snow and rain situation if one was to arise concerning the buildings. She thanked all the members of the Facilities Committee for a wonderful job this past year. They have dedicated many hours to the district facilities needs. On Feb. 2, 2008 the committee met to discuss the location of MC2. MOTION: K. Cota MOVED to relocate the MC2 program to the Wilcox Building. SECOND: J. Kenyon. DISCUSSION: K. Cota gave the rational for the move. She did say that they have looked at different options and decided on the Wilcox Building. The items that need to be fixed should be fixed regardless. C. Dreyfuss commented that members of the public commented that the program should be closer to the high school. J. Carnie asked for the cost of the upgrades. It was mentioned that there is a cost sheet included but K.Chambers would be working on the final figure. E. Jacod asked how long the MC2 Program would continue. C. Dreyfuss commented that as long as the Board supports the Choice Programs. MC2 is a NEASC commendation. K. Cota explained that the Board is not voting on the cost to repair. K. Cota explained that there is a lot of work to reach the number and they would like to know first if the Board supports the move. W. Felton commented that Wilcox lacks a number of items and the changes made would be useful down the road. VOTE: 10.570/0/2.951/1.479. Motion passes. The committee discussed the contract with KBA for the design for a new middle school and renovations to the high school. They have asked input from the administration on how building the new middle school would affect the teacher and staff levels. K. Cota commented on an article in the Richmond Rooster written by J. Carnie. She said that the article states that there is a “dirty little secret” regarding the $37 million-dollar building proposal. She reported on the many meetings in which the issue was mentioned, the web link, the display of the architects proposed plan at the Deliberative Session and the distribution of the 50 books to the Board Members, town offices and Budget Committee Members. This is an insult to the dedicated members of the Facilities Committee. K. Cota mentioned the information she had placed in the Board packet’s regarding the meeting in which she attended. The High Performance Schools Exchange and Greening New Hampshire’s Schools. There is a reimbursement for being a high performance school. J. Fortson asked if the Director of Building and Grounds was hired and why the Board did not approve the individual. K. Dassau explained that it is not a certified position. K. Cota explained that the salary is at $75,000.00 and he did not need the health insurance. S. Oerman thanked K. Cota for her hard work on the Facilities Committee. 

3.   Finance Committee: J. Carnie reported that the committee met earlier tonight. The action from this committee had been discussed already. He asked if he could respond to the Facilities Chair. He commented that the statement he made is exactly correct. He said that the Finance Committee had debit financing on their agenda for months. The Finance Committee had requested from the Facilities Committee an accurate number and they could not get one. They heard 15 or 16 million-dollars and they were surprised to get a 37 million-dollar number. He was told that was not the number. C. Dreyfuss commented that was not the proposal on the table. J. Carnie commented that the figure was brought up deliberately after the Budget Committee met. C. Dreyfuss said that the Board voted on the architectural drawings for a middle school. J Carnie commented that the 37 million-dollars were not told until after the Budget Committee. It was a deliberate attempt not to discuss it around the teacher and support staff contracts. He commented that he supports and backs the article in the Richmond Rooster. 

4.   Policy Committee: MOTION: K. Colby MOVED to accept Policy IJOC Volunteers as presented dated 2-24-08. SECOND: S. Oerman. DISCUSSION: G. White explained that the intent of the policy is to prevent criminals and sex offenders from working closely with children in our schools. Criminal checks are being done on volunteers now. VOTE: 12.465/0/1.056/1.479. Motion passes. MOTION: J. Kenyon MOVED to accept Policy GBCD as amended by the Policy Committee dated 2-24-08. SECOND: K. Colby. DISCUSSION: G. White explained that the committee added “volunteers not categorized as “Designated Volunteers” per Policy IJOC” and the committee crossed out that the criminal check is the responsibility of any person the Board requires to have one. VOTE: 12.712/0/0.809/1.479. Motion passes. G. White thanked the Policy Committee Members for their part this past year on the Policy Committee.   

5.   Budget Committee: The Budget Committee has not met since the Deliberative Session. 

6.   Cheshire Career Center: W. Wright reported that there was a working lunch meeting and they were presented next years packets. The people in attendance visited classrooms. They commended the work of the Director of the Automotive Dept. which he has done for the past 30 years. There was a presentation given at Monadnock from the CCC and it was well attended. W. Wright had handouts for the Board. K. Dassau explained that J. Smith, the Director of the CCC and himself would be meeting to discuss the contract. K.Dassau explained that he was given a draft only of the contract. J. Smith commented that no student was refused this year. The students are required to complete two years at the CCC. J. Smith explained that was part of the funding. W. Wright informed the Board that there are 59 slots at the CCC for Monadnock students.

7.   Legislative Committee: D. Lyman reported that Senate Bill 539 would increase the school district aid to Monadnock from a 1.9 million-dollar decrease to over $500,000.00. He handed out a spread sheet of all the towns to the Board. He explained that next month the items on the agenda are a Bill for collective bargaining mandates, the evergreen clause in every contract and fewer than 10 employees to form a bargaining unit. He is asking the Board permission to write a letter to kill the three Bills. D. Lyman passed out a copy of his statement that he read regarding the state aid and the per pupil cost. J. Fortson thanked D. Lyman for his efforts.  

8.   Action on the Manifest: MOTION: S. Oerman MOVED to accept the manifest in the amount of $2,960,930.21. SECOND: K. Colby. VOTE: 12.500/0/1.021/1.479. Motion passes.

 

10. Superintendent’s Report: K. Dassau informed the Board that the meeting with the Troy Selectmen was very beneficial and productive.

 

      K. Dassau asked for clarification on the 2 million-dollar surplus from J. Fortson who served on the Default budget. J. Fortson explained that there were 1.2 million-dollars in under expenditures which included over $200,000. in health insurance savings. About $900,000. was in additional revenues  J. Carnie commented that the Board is saying that there is a 2.9% increase in the budget but it is really 27% increase that the voters need to raise. The Board is misleading the public. You can not tell a Board Member that he can not have an opposing view.  

 

11.   BOARD CHAIR REPORT: C. Dreyfuss commented on the fact that the Board spent 2 hours discussing education. C. Dreyfuss commented on her position as the Chair. She said that she contacted K. Dassau and asked what the position involved and he played down the position. She said that she learned a lot about politics and people. Some people like conflict. This Board needed time to reach a solution. She said that G. White and K. Cota have done a great job. S. Oerman, J. Fortson and K. Chambers are the number crunchers. W. Wright and W. Felton when discussing an educational issue would push you back on track. We all work hard. She thanked the Board for the many opportunities. K. Dassau commented that Board Chair is not an easy job. 

   

12.SETTING NEXT MEETING AGENDA:

1.               New Members/swearing in

2.               Board Election

3.               Review Warrant Results

4.               Retention Policy

5.               AYP Update – High School

6.               NEASC Summary Sheets

 

13.SECOND PUBLIC COMMENTS: E. Kaplan thanked C. Dreyfuss and the Board for their efforts. E. Kaplan commented on parts of the article in the Richmond Rooster. He commented on the fact that OSHA states that the doors of a room that house chemicals are to open out. That is the law and the rules.

 

M. Hoeffer would encourage the Board to be on the positive route and make progress with the NEASC issues.

 

K. Cota thanked C. Dreyfuss and the School Board Members. She said that C.Dreyfuss raised the standards as a chair and how the School Board should be run. She was a person to be proud of. She thanked C. Dreyfuss.

 

W. Wright thanked K. Colby for his time on the School Board. K. Colby thanked the School Board and the administration.

 

G. White commented that being elected the Vice Chair usually you do not do anything except in this case. C. Dreyfuss gave him a lot. She communicate to him, showed the importance of his job and he tried to respond. She inspired him to be a better School Board Member. He enjoyed working with her. She has a lot of energy. He was thrilled to sit beside her for the last two years. She did a great job.

 

15. Adjournment: MOTION: K. Colby  MOVED to adjourn the meeting at 10:35 PM. SECOND: D. Lyman VOTE: Unanimous for those present. Motion passes.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

Laura L. Aivaliotis

MRSD Recording Secretary