MONADNOCK REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Board Meeting Minutes

                                               January 16, 2006

                              Monadnock Regional Middle School/High School, Swanzey, NH

                      

Present: Tim Aho, James Carnie, Karen Cota, Colline Dreyfuss, Alan Gross, Jason Hill, Jonathan Kenyon, Bruce McCulley, Richard Thackston, Bruce Tatro, Gene White. Absent: Jeff Friedman, Charles Johnson, and Robin Marra.  

Also present: K. Dassau, Superintendent of Schools; D. Hodgdon, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum & Instruction; and L. Biron, Business Manager.  Principals: K. Craig and B. Tatro.

 

R. Thackston called the meeting to order at 2:04 p.m. D. Thackston explained the purpose of the special school board meeting – to make a decision about the school board’s position on Article #1 about the operating budget.  He explained that the special meeting was called because of the timing for the posting of the warrant articles.  Other articles could be addressed, as desired or needed.

 

R. Thackston asked J. Fortson to review the decisions of the budget committee on Thursday, January 12.  She explained that Tom Parker proposed a motion to set the budget at a 5.1% increase over the current year’s budget figure.  To reach this level, he suggested some reductions as well as accepting an insurance increase of 20%, assuming that the current projection for the insurance increase would be lower than the current projection.  He also offered that the administration could return to the budget committee to request the use of revenues to cover the additional cost of the health insurance if the costs should be higher than 20%.  B. McCulley asked the reason for the 20%.  J. Fortson explained that Winchester had set a cap at 20%, the insurance is typically lower than projected, and there was a desire to see the additional money for insurance be returned to the taxpayer.

 

D. Thackston offered three choices: 1) allowing the prior motion of the school board to stand; 2) amending the motion to agree with the budget committee’s budget figure; or 3) producing a third budget figure.  G. White observed that the default budget figure was higher than the budget committee’s figure; C Dreyfuss wondered about the pros and cons of having a budget figure consistent with the budget committee’s figure; B. McCulley questioned recommending a figure below the default budget.  MOTION: A. Gross MOVED that the school board not support the budget committee’s proposed budget figure. SECOND: B. McCulley. DISCUSSION: J. Carnie questioned the efficacy of the motion in light of the motion made during the previous meeting, suggesting the benefit in the school board’s setting a number before disagreeing with the budget committee’s number.  D. Thackston explained that he believed the motion was in order in light of the decision of the budget committee to change the number the school board was working with.  J. Carnie expressed concern about bringing to the voters three different budget figures – the budget figure the budget committee voted for (6.7% increase), the default budget figure (6.4% increase), and the budget committee figure of 5.1%.  He suggested that the school board and budget committee could likely have come to an agreement about a budget figure if it were equivalent with the default budget figure.  K. Cota disagreed with this assessment and argued for the three figures on the warrant article.  VOTE: 5.579/5.616/0/3.805. Motion failed. 

 

MOTION: J. Carnie MOVED that the school board support the budget committee’s proposed budget figure of a 5.1% increase. SECOND: J. Hill. DISCUSSION:  There was a discussion about the extent to which the school board had examined the budget in depth and the short timeframe to make a decision.  C. Dreyfuss explained that she attended the budget committee meeting and expressed some concerns about the budget cut, since part of the proposal was a reduction of teachers at Cutler and Mt. Caesar, compromising the programs in these two schools.  She was also concerned about the idea of the 20% limit on the health insurance, since the administration had been working with the budget committee to avoid needing to come to the committee to use additional revenues to cover overexpenditures.  K. Dassau responded to a question about the impact of the budget committee figure on the schools by reminding the board members of the three levels of reductions the administrators presented to the budget committee and indicating that the administrators will be meeting on the ensuing day to decide on reductions to get to the 5.1% figure to present to the school board at its Tuesday evening school board meeting.  K. Cota, B. McCulley, and J. Carnie agreed that the school board wouldn’t need to come up with cuts to get to a budget figure until after the March vote.  VOTE: 4.190/7.005/0/3.805. Motion failed. 

 

S. Sciuto, a science teacher at the high school, highlighted her concerns about some of the reductions that had been presented to reach various percentage levels of increase.  She focused on the reduction of teachers, maintenance, class size, and the quality of the high school.

 

D. Thackston then turned the gavel to vice-chairperson, J. Carnie, so that he could make a motion.  MOTION: D. Thackston MOVED that the school board support the default budget figures as its recommended budget figure.  SECOND: B. McCulley. DISCUSSION:  G. White inquired about whether or not it would be necessary to reconsider the vote during the previous meeting before making a motion to change that vote.  D. Thackston agreed to withdraw his motion and B. McCulley withdrew his second.  MOTION: D. Thackston MOVED that the school board reconsider its prior action.  SECOND: B. McCulley. VOTE: 5.579/2.605/3.011/3.805. Motion passed. 

 

MOTION: D. Thackston MOVED that the school board change its recommendation to match the default budget figure.  SECOND: B. McCulley. DISCUSSION:  C. Dreyfuss asked if the school board had the authority to decide where the money would be spent if the school board accepted the default budget figure.  It was emphasized that the school board has that authority. 

 

J. Fortson took exception with some comments that she believed impugned her character and credibility.  She emphasized that, in building the default budget, she was careful to look at every detail of employees’ salaries and benefits to ensure that they were accurate. 

 

VOTE: 4.4/6.019/.776/3.805. Motion failed.

 

D. Thackston left at 3:24 p.m.  J. Carnie assumed the role of chairperson for the remainder of the meeting.

 

MOTION: K. Cota MOVED that the school board leave Article 1 as accepted at the previous school board meeting.  SECOND: C. Dreyfuss. VOTE: 10.174/0/0/4.826. Motion passed.

 

MOTION: K. Cota MOVED to adjourn the meeting.  SECOND: B. McCulley. VOTE: 8.995/0/0/6.005. Motion passed.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

 

 

Dr. David G. Hodgdon

Acting MRSD Recording Secretary